Jump to content

Truly, Lawfully, Evilly Yours

  • entries
    8
  • comments
    29
  • views
    4,295

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Loveday

Posted

This story is making the rounds of all the genealogy pages on FB this week. Some people are panicking, others are saying it's nothing, it's just info you can find anywhere online. My problem with it is that, unlike Ancestry or FamilySearch, it links living people to your name. Not to mention all the places you've lived for the past thirty years or more. Yes, that's all available somewhere online, but not generally all in one spot. And genealogy sites tend to be pretty careful about publicly showing living people. Except for the living people on your own tree on Ancestry, for example, you can't see any other tree's living members, they just show up as 'private.' You have to get permission from that tree's owner to see those people. 

There's an opt-out feature on this thing; I used it, and seem to have disappeared from the site, for now, at least. They're going to have to change the way they do things if they want to be a viable, useful genealogy site.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
nausicaa

Posted

As a woman who is single, lives alone, and is dating, I am terrified that they list my address. I rent and therefore could typically keep my address under wraps pretty easily until now. I went on the site and opted out. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
clueliss

Posted

I heard about this through a group I belong to that involves writing about public safety (police, fire, etc) and there was much concern about them that people could find out the contact information for those type of folks.  

http://www.familytreenow.com/optout

That is the link to their opt out page.  I just opted myself out (and Mom, hers isn't up to date but I'm taking it off anyway)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo?

Posted

Thanks for posting this, @lawfulevil. :) And thanks for posting the direct link for opting out, @clueliss. :) I just opted out. I wasn't surprised to see my info, but it was much more accurate and detailed than "white pages" type listings I've found of myself.

Ha! A bunch of those "white pages" list me with my mom's birthday. That explains all the calls and mailings I get for hearing aids, medic alert systems, retirement centers, and home delivery of my Medicare approved medical supplies. :pb_rollseyes: By the time I'm old enough to qualify for Medicare (if it still exists), I'm going to be so cranky about all the stupid marketing and all-out fraud that is aimed at seniors. It's so debasing and cynical.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
clueliss

Posted

I made sure to opt out my mom even though that was out of date post move to nursing home because her mail comes to me.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • LillyP

      Posted

      It's funny because as a mom of two young kids (6 & 3) I am very much a "time and place" person when it comes kids in public spaces. I think that 100% yes kids have a right to be in public places, and kids in restaurants and planes and places are just a part of life. BUT, I do think there is such a thing as using common sense and I feel like wayyyy too many parents these days feel entitled to bring their kids to places that while it's within their right to do so, it's probably not appropriate. 

      I do admit though that I am probably slightly biased on the subject because as a wedding & family photographer I see it alllll the time. I'm team no kids at weddings, which is always a hot topic. And for me it really boils down to the fact that weddings are formal events and *most* of the time the kids are a big disruption. And it's not that they're being bad, *they're just being kids*. Unfortunately too many parents just either a) don't pay attention or keep their kids in check, or b) are watching their kids and find nothing wrong with their behavior. 

      We are relatively strict parents when it comes to behavior, dare I say "old school". We take our kids out to restaurants A LOT, we fly with them regularly, etc. No kids are perfect, and no matter how strict you are every kid has their moments, tantrums, etc. IMO the difference is in how you handle it and doing so in a way that it doesn't disrupt other people. That might not be a popular opinion, but I absolutely feel that while it's my right to take my kids out to dinner, it's also the right of the other patrons to not listen to my kids yell and scream and be annoying.

    • treehugger

      Posted

      I really think it depends where you live as to what attitudes people have towards kids. I always felt really insecure about having my kids in public in Southern Ontario (where mega families were common) because people were unbelievably judgy about how they behaved and my parenting in general.
       

      Then we moved to downtown Montreal, where having more than 1 kid was considered a big family, and everyone is just so kind and supportive and encouraging. No one batted an eye at them. I swear that’s why we moved here. 

      • Upvote 1
    • LillyP

      Posted

      I feel like they're just regular old Fall family portraits...it's that time of year! All my clients are getting on the books for their Christmas card photos now too. At first I thought maybe an announcement based on the bear with pink ribbon, but I actually think it's more possible that is just to honor the loss they had. I can't imagine they'd give that much away prior to a big announcement. I could be wrong though.

      • Upvote 2
    • GuineaPigCourtship

      Posted

      My bet is it's all for show so they're not changing anything.  After all, these people side hugged their own kids.

      • Upvote 1
    • Howl

      Posted

      5 hours ago, sleepygirl1 said:

      Catch me up on the Bradrick family? Are they the ones that had a daughter in law wear a yellow wedding dress?

      Bradrick! and wife #1 Kelly were the darlings and the couple-of-the-year and marriage of the year  amonst the Vision Forum elite.

      Kelly and Bradrick! proceeded to quickly have six children before the perfect marriage imploded and Kelly sued for divorce, based on...nobody knows for sure.  I

      n the meantime,  Vision Forum had imploded because Doug Phillips was exposed as a sexual predator;  the Vision Forum gravy train left the station and left Bradrick! high and dry.  The young couple headed to the Pacific Northwest where Bradrick!'s family lives and Bradrick! became a realtor.  There's a classic photo of Kelly pregnant and maybe even barefoot, standing on the deck outside their mobile home on a damp day, surrounded by very young children. She looked so...over it. 

      Bradrick! stayed in the Pacific Northwest and Kelly and six kids flounced home to daddy Scottie Brown and then she married the current husband. 

       



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.