Jump to content

Totally Not A Blog

  • entries
    9
  • comments
    70
  • views
    3,417

Vex

1,497 views

I just want to preface this with the following: This game contains a literal hive vagina. My first thought was of Free Jinger (after I stopped gagging and crossing my legs).


I know this is very much not the place to make a rant about video games, but I need to get this out and it's the only blog I have. My fiance and my friends can only hear me whinge so many times.

I am a gamer. A casual gamer to be sure, but I love games.
In particular, I love a genre called 'survival horror'. Now, there are some atrocious survival horror games. There are also some outstanding games, and outstanding series.

Perhaps the best example of survival horror, in my opinion, is the Silent Hill series as made by Team Silent. That encompasses games 1-4. Silent Hill 2 in particular is an incredible piece of art. It is art. It tells a heart-wrenching story of love, hate, guilt, grief and loss. The ending of the game feels like a gut punch.

Resident Evil is another survival horror series. It predates Silent Hill by a couple of years. Although certainly atmospheric and creepy, it's much more of an action-based series. The puzzles are simplistic. Where Silent Hill demands you to sift through lengthy poems to deduce their meaning, RE asks you to find keys and solve basic visual puzzles. There are zombies - oh so many zombies - in place of Silent Hill's unique enemies, who are all conjured by the mind of the protagonist or other inhabitants of the titular town. Silent Hill has some narmy dialogue, but Resident Evil is straight up cheese, such as the infamous line "You were almost a Jill sandwich!"

They are very different, and I expect completely different things from them.

Silent Hill is grounded. It explores adult fears. It's highly psychological. It's far more concerned with story and atmosphere than combat. Its protagonists are every day people with no special skills. You play Silent Hill for the story and the journey.

Resident Evil is fantastical. It's about zombies and biological warfare. The story takes a backseat to action. The dialogue is hammy and protagonists give pithy one-liners. It has moments of fantastic atmosphere, but there are plenty of guns and the protagonists are generally elite special forces officers with army backgrounds.

They have always been two very distinct things.

 

Now Resident Evil 7 has come out, and the lines have been hopelessly blurred.

One of the main developers of RE7 came straight out of the most recent Silent Hill effort, Silent Hills. It was cancelled and they wound up on board Resident Evil 7.

And it shows. Oh, does it show.

The game feels more Silent Hill - specifically PT, the playable teaser for Silent Hills - than Resident Evil.
Gone are the things that made the series distinctive - the trained protagonist, the insane arsenal, the narmy charm and the one liners.
You still explore the halls of a mansion, but instead of hunting down its warped inhabitants, YOU are the prey. You run and hide from antagonists you cannot fight. In that way it feels more like Outlast than Resident Evil.
The puzzles retain that Resident Evil feel - they're very much in keeping with the series - but nothing else is. The save room music sounds like Silent Hill music. It's as if the game went out of its way to be as similar to Silent Hills as possible, right down to its first-person perspective and suspiciously-similar ghost girl. There's barely any hint of a connection to the wider universe of Resident Evil - it is there if you look, but I expect mostly it's hidden in the downloadable content episodes.


The worst part is the plot, because the plot has literally been taken from a Silent Hill game.

The plot of Silent Hill 2 is as follows: A man named James has received a letter from his wife, Mary, begging him to come to her in 'their special place'. The problem is that Mary has been dead for 3 years... or has she?

The plot of Resident Evil 7 is as follows: A man named Ethan has received a video tape from his wife, Mia, begging him to come to Louisiana and save her. The problem is, Mia has been dead for three years... or has she?

See the issue?

Resident Evil 7 has been met with tremendous acclaim. Much like when Resident Evil 4 was released it has revitalised the series, and for that I'm glad.
I just miss my Resident Evil. They finally listened to the fans who have been begging for a return to its horror roots, only they sacrificed everything that made Resident Evil itself to do so.


And I just can't get behind it.

  • Upvote 1

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo?

Posted

Quote

I know this is very much not the place to make a rant about video games, but I need to get this out and it's the only blog I have. My fiance and my friends can only hear me whinge so many times.

I'm pretty sure you're fine to talk about anything you want on your blog. I think @EyeQueue blogged about video games a few times, but I think she is a big horror fan, so maybe not exactly the same thing as Resident Evil and Silent Hill.

These 2 blog entries were about video games:

Spoiler

 

I'm not a gamer, but I do understand being frustrated by changes to things you like. :) Don't get me started on the changes to the Star Trek universe that J.J. Abrams made in his movie. :pb_lol:

Link to comment
2 hours ago, WhatWouldJohnCrichtonDo? said:

I'm pretty sure you're fine to talk about anything you want on your blog. I think @EyeQueue blogged about video games a few times, but I think she is a big horror fan, so maybe not exactly the same thing as Resident Evil and Silent Hill.

These 2 blog entries were about video games:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I'm not a gamer, but I do understand being frustrated by changes to things you like. :) Don't get me started on the changes to the Star Trek universe that J.J. Abrams made in his movie. :pb_lol:


Thanks :)
Just feels a bit weird to be ranting about horror games here, lol.

I can totally understand your frustration with the J.J Abrams Star Trek movie. I'm not really a trekkie (although I do love the original series and Voyager) but I'm in nerdy enough circles to know how much it sucked for longtime fans.

I'm totally fine with change in general because change is necessary to keep the series fresh. If they hadn't taken a huge gamble in Resident Evil 4 and taken out the Zombies and moved it away from Raccoon City/the US and made it more action-based the series would have died in the early 2000s. I'm just sad they essentially gutted the series to take out the things that made it identifiable, and irritated that they're aping off another game/series.

As I play through it is feeling a bit more RE-ish, at least when I can actually fight the enemies. I still wouldn't know it was a Resident Evil game if you took the name out of the title, though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
EyeQueue

Posted

I am, indeed, a big fan, and Silent Hill and Resident Evil are on my list to play, but I haven't gotten around to them yet. And I'm not sure why, because they both overlap into two things I'm really into: horror and videya games. :) Sorry I don't have anything more to offer since I'm not familiar with the games (I think I've seen the first RE movie), but I can understand your frustration at getting into something and then having developers change it on you.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
OldFadedStar

Posted

What I would love to see is them to modernize the original games. I'm a big RE fan but I got into the series a bit late. I can't play the first three because of how old they are. 

I do wish that RE7 did fit into the series a bit more... it does seem really random in comparison to the other games. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Mama Mia

      Posted

      2 hours ago, viii said:

      Likely to honour Isla. So far Jill seems to grieve her publicly, much like Lauren did with her first loss. 

      I think she may be doing a pregnancy announcement, just from some of the posing, but either way I think the bear is to honor and include Isla. She posts a lot about her. I kinda think that may be why she was less involved with Jana’s wedding, rather than some deeper sibling issue. It was pretty soon after her loss, she was clearly deeply grieving, Jana may have just not wanted to ask her to do a bunch of stuff during that time. I doubt they are super close, but they seem to get along well enough. 

    • LillyP

      Posted

      It's funny because as a mom of two young kids (6 & 3) I am very much a "time and place" person when it comes kids in public spaces. I think that 100% yes kids have a right to be in public places, and kids in restaurants and planes and places are just a part of life. BUT, I do think there is such a thing as using common sense and I feel like wayyyy too many parents these days feel entitled to bring their kids to places that while it's within their right to do so, it's probably not appropriate. 

      I do admit though that I am probably slightly biased on the subject because as a wedding & family photographer I see it alllll the time. I'm team no kids at weddings, which is always a hot topic. And for me it really boils down to the fact that weddings are formal events and *most* of the time the kids are a big disruption. And it's not that they're being bad, *they're just being kids*. Unfortunately too many parents just either a) don't pay attention or keep their kids in check, or b) are watching their kids and find nothing wrong with their behavior. 

      We are relatively strict parents when it comes to behavior, dare I say "old school". We take our kids out to restaurants A LOT, we fly with them regularly, etc. No kids are perfect, and no matter how strict you are every kid has their moments, tantrums, etc. IMO the difference is in how you handle it and doing so in a way that it doesn't disrupt other people. That might not be a popular opinion, but I absolutely feel that while it's my right to take my kids out to dinner, it's also the right of the other patrons to not listen to my kids yell and scream and be annoying.

    • treehugger

      Posted

      I really think it depends where you live as to what attitudes people have towards kids. I always felt really insecure about having my kids in public in Southern Ontario (where mega families were common) because people were unbelievably judgy about how they behaved and my parenting in general.
       

      Then we moved to downtown Montreal, where having more than 1 kid was considered a big family, and everyone is just so kind and supportive and encouraging. No one batted an eye at them. I swear that’s why we moved here. 

      • Upvote 1
    • LillyP

      Posted

      I feel like they're just regular old Fall family portraits...it's that time of year! All my clients are getting on the books for their Christmas card photos now too. At first I thought maybe an announcement based on the bear with pink ribbon, but I actually think it's more possible that is just to honor the loss they had. I can't imagine they'd give that much away prior to a big announcement. I could be wrong though.

      • Upvote 2
    • GuineaPigCourtship

      Posted

      My bet is it's all for show so they're not changing anything.  After all, these people side hugged their own kids.

      • Upvote 1


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.