Jump to content

Baby Thor

  • entries
    104
  • comments
    791
  • views
    17,963

Sleepy Thorsdays


Imrlgoddess

1,223 views

I waz bein' sweet sweet kitty last night on my momma's nice binky.  She keeps it on her throne so I can sleeps behind her.  The authorities don't let me in the mysterious room that has their smell at people sleepy time anymores....but they let that stinky dog thing in there.  She's very delicates, she doesn't play or swat back at me.  But in the mornings the daddy authority lets me in dat room and I give my mommy big head boops and rub her faces wif my wet nose so she gets allll my scent.  She's mine ya know.  And I try to take care of hers and flea her face and paws but she pushes me off and says Ow! No!  I'm just trying to help.  

I tink it's nap times till my peoples come back from The World.

-T. Thor Winchester the Thord.

20170726_224333.jpg

20170726_224411.jpg

20170726_224418.jpg

  • Upvote 9

8 Comments


Recommended Comments

Imrlgoddess

Posted

I absolutely can't get over how big and shiny he is.  He's a far cry from the patchy haired little runt he was.  

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
CorruptionInc.

Posted

Beans!!! 

Gosh he's such a gorgeous cat! 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
feministxtian

Posted

what a serious hunk of kitty luv there! Thor, buddy...Luke & Leia aren't allowed in their mama & papa's room at sleepy time either. If you guys weren't so wild and naughty at sleepy time, then you'd be allowed in...but mama & papa are trying to sleepy not play. But, think of this...you can get into all the things that mama and papa say no to...they're not there! And, you get to see mama in morning time and remind her that she belongs to you!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
catlady

Posted

I love the leg draped down in the first photo!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Imrlgoddess

Posted

He's got lounging down pat!

@feministxtian I totally forgot to add, Little Hooman had a fresh peach in the fruit/snack bowl on the kitchen island. I found said peach the other morning in the hallway, mangled & chewed upon. Apparently he tagged a bit & then realized it rolled! Thank goodness for wood floors & steam mops! 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
feministxtian

Posted

We can't leave fruit out with the dynamic duo. If it's round, it can be batted all over the place...so that's a big NOPE. Dip and Shit are an 8 legged wrecking crew...they've gotten into potato chips, doritos, water bottles (fortunately could not open them), you name it, they get into it! 

Thor-baby is just the most adorable thing...smart, sleek, owns the hoomans. Yup....he has it rough!

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Imrlgoddess

Posted

I'm not sure how the word "ate" turned into "tagged" but yeah, he did some nibbling prior to the joy roll down the hall. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • LillyP

      Posted

      It's funny because as a mom of two young kids (6 & 3) I am very much a "time and place" person when it comes kids in public spaces. I think that 100% yes kids have a right to be in public places, and kids in restaurants and planes and places are just a part of life. BUT, I do think there is such a thing as using common sense and I feel like wayyyy too many parents these days feel entitled to bring their kids to places that while it's within their right to do so, it's probably not appropriate. 

      I do admit though that I am probably slightly biased on the subject because as a wedding & family photographer I see it alllll the time. I'm team no kids at weddings, which is always a hot topic. And for me it really boils down to the fact that weddings are formal events and *most* of the time the kids are a big disruption. And it's not that they're being bad, *they're just being kids*. Unfortunately too many parents just either a) don't pay attention or keep their kids in check, or b) are watching their kids and find nothing wrong with their behavior. 

      We are relatively strict parents when it comes to behavior, dare I say "old school". We take our kids out to restaurants A LOT, we fly with them regularly, etc. No kids are perfect, and no matter how strict you are every kid has their moments, tantrums, etc. IMO the difference is in how you handle it and doing so in a way that it doesn't disrupt other people. That might not be a popular opinion, but I absolutely feel that while it's my right to take my kids out to dinner, it's also the right of the other patrons to not listen to my kids yell and scream and be annoying.

    • treehugger

      Posted

      I really think it depends where you live as to what attitudes people have towards kids. I always felt really insecure about having my kids in public in Southern Ontario (where mega families were common) because people were unbelievably judgy about how they behaved and my parenting in general.
       

      Then we moved to downtown Montreal, where having more than 1 kid was considered a big family, and everyone is just so kind and supportive and encouraging. No one batted an eye at them. I swear that’s why we moved here. 

      • Upvote 1
    • LillyP

      Posted

      I feel like they're just regular old Fall family portraits...it's that time of year! All my clients are getting on the books for their Christmas card photos now too. At first I thought maybe an announcement based on the bear with pink ribbon, but I actually think it's more possible that is just to honor the loss they had. I can't imagine they'd give that much away prior to a big announcement. I could be wrong though.

      • Upvote 2
    • GuineaPigCourtship

      Posted

      My bet is it's all for show so they're not changing anything.  After all, these people side hugged their own kids.

      • Upvote 1
    • Howl

      Posted

      5 hours ago, sleepygirl1 said:

      Catch me up on the Bradrick family? Are they the ones that had a daughter in law wear a yellow wedding dress?

      Bradrick! and wife #1 Kelly were the darlings and the couple-of-the-year and marriage of the year  amonst the Vision Forum elite.

      Kelly and Bradrick! proceeded to quickly have six children before the perfect marriage imploded and Kelly sued for divorce, based on...nobody knows for sure.  I

      n the meantime,  Vision Forum had imploded because Doug Phillips was exposed as a sexual predator;  the Vision Forum gravy train left the station and left Bradrick! high and dry.  The young couple headed to the Pacific Northwest where Bradrick!'s family lives and Bradrick! became a realtor.  There's a classic photo of Kelly pregnant and maybe even barefoot, standing on the deck outside their mobile home on a damp day, surrounded by very young children. She looked so...over it. 

      Bradrick! stayed in the Pacific Northwest and Kelly and six kids flounced home to daddy Scottie Brown and then she married the current husband. 

       



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.